Jump to content

Patriot

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Patriot last won the day on May 15 2014

Patriot had the most liked content!

About Patriot

  • Birthday 02/06/1963

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://wet4all.com

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Denmark
  • Interests
    Among alot of other stuff, online gaming

Patriot's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

5

Reputation

  1. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  2. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  3. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  4. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  5. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  6. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  7. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  8. Happy Birthday Patriot!
  9. Patriot

    Teamkill

    thanks for the suggestions, il try them out and see if i can get it to work
  10. Patriot

    Teamkill

    No one knows where server logs teamkills? anyway thanks for reading this
  11. Patriot

    Teamkill

    Hello Im working on some old stats system for ET - http://www.wet4all.com/forum/statsgen.php trying to get it upgraded and working perfect on WET servers And it seems to be picking up most of the stuff i want it to. teamkill however i cant get it to catch. so question is. Ive gone through my logs and cant find a place where it says teamkill, i can find all the usualls like MOD_MP40, MOD_SUICIDE etc etc is there a setting in a cvar i somehow missed? so that the server dosent save teamkills to logs? hope someone can help. thanks in advance Carsten
  12. Calling it a built-in no recoil hack is just your opinion, not mine, which just shows we disagree on that point. Im pretty sure that modmakers are interested in seeing their mods running on servers, so question about wether etpub should migrate or not is purely theoretical. besides that etpub/jaymod/nq all seems to be dead as no Development is made, silent is stil very much alive, so why not try an get ppl using old mods to migrate? you dont see many servers running etmain or shrubbet mods anymore. Definition of a hack must be somthing like a player using a setting or a program that others cant use an thereby get a huge advantage. A setting that all can use, or even can be forced to all is not a hack, its just a cvar. Ive seen people calling hitsounds a cheat
  13. Well I understand what your writing, I just dont understand your reasoning. True, People will always complain about 1 or another thing when playing FPS I have been running ET Servers for the last 10 Years, and what I truely like about WET is the total freedom of what I can do with my servers. Damagekick is not a cheat its just a cvar, i can through my cfgs make it possible for people to use it or to not use it, i can even force it. So my question is actually the same why restrict a setting that would eventually make sure that ETPub servers was transformed to silEnT? Dont get me wrong, I like the silEnT Mod, and are the opinion its the best mod around atm. I just Cant see the reason to make cvar restrictions in the mod, why not let it be up to the serveradmins?, let them decide what they think their players should have. I know ETPub is the one introducing it, but that didnt mean it was bad, I see features in silEnT that has been in other Mods before, and I truely like the fact that you Guys are doing a great job with it.
  14. Make sure you have this files etmain: server.cfg or silent.cfg and make sure you exec a maprotation file like objectivecycle.cfg in the server or silent.cfg, also make sure the objectivecycle.cfg (or whatevernameucallit) is in etmain. silent: the silent client pk3, the qagame.mp.i386.so (Linux) or the qagame.mp.i386.so (Windows) in the root of your et you should have a startscript here is mine its for Linux #!/bin/bash opts="+exec whatever.cfg +set net_port 27960 +set net_port_extra 27970 +set fs_homepath /opt/games/et3.0 +set fs_game silent +set g_dbMaxAliases 6 +sets gamestartup \"`date +"%D %T"`\"" while [ 1 ]; do ./etded $opts done finally make sure that the maps your calling for in your map.cfg (objectivecycle.cfg) also is placed into your etmain hope it helps
  15. sorry for opening this old thread Again just wondering if this still is a nogo? I have lots of etpub members complaining about it atm, for them its a complete turnoff that they cant have it off. if it was implemented in silent I would just use a forcecvar to make sure all had it. Why not implement and thereby make sure etpub is left in the dust to die out? pretty sure that setting alone is 1 of the mainthing we still see etpub servers. sorry Again for reopening an old post
×
×
  • Create New...