Patriot

thanks for the suggestions, il try them out and see if i can get it to work

No one knows where server logs teamkills?

 

anyway thanks for reading this

Hello

 

Im working on some old stats system for ET - http://www.wet4all.com/forum/statsgen.php trying to get it upgraded and working perfect on WET servers

 

And it seems to be picking up most of the stuff i want it to.

 

teamkill however i cant get it to catch.

 

so question is.

 

Ive gone through my logs and cant find a place where it says teamkill, i can find all the usualls like MOD_MP40, MOD_SUICIDE etc etc

 

is there a setting in a cvar i somehow missed? so that the server dosent save teamkills to logs?

 

hope someone can help.

 

thanks in advance

 

Carsten

Calling it a built-in no recoil hack is just your opinion, not mine, which just shows we disagree on that point.

 

Im pretty sure that modmakers are interested in seeing their mods running on servers, so question about wether etpub should migrate or not is purely theoretical. besides that etpub/jaymod/nq all seems to be dead as no Development is made, silent is stil very much alive, so why not try an get ppl using old mods to migrate? you dont see many servers running etmain or shrubbet mods anymore.

 

Definition of a hack must be somthing like a player using a setting or a program that others cant use an thereby get a huge advantage.

 

A setting that all can use, or even can be forced to all is not a hack, its just a cvar.

 

Ive seen people calling hitsounds a cheat

Any change on server would result in few players complaining. It's up to the admins what to tell them. 

 

Upon each ETPub version update on my server from 0.7 to 0.9 players use to whine about hitbox change when ETPUB dev team use to tell there is no change in hitbox. 

 

My question made years back still stands. Which modes beside ETPUB uses to disable damagekick? 

 

There was a reason why we removed it on the first hand and we still haven't found reason to add it back.

 

If you have any specific reason to add it back please feel free to share and we will look into it.

Well I understand what your writing, I just dont understand your reasoning.

True, People will always complain about 1 or another thing when playing FPS

I have been running ET Servers for the last 10 Years, and what I truely like about WET is the total freedom of what I can do with my servers.

Damagekick is not a cheat its just a cvar, i can through my cfgs make it possible for people to use it or to not use it, i can even force it.

So my question is actually the same why restrict a setting that would eventually make sure that ETPub servers was transformed to silEnT?

 

Dont get me wrong, I like the silEnT Mod, and are the opinion its the best mod around atm.

 

I just Cant see the reason to make cvar restrictions in the mod, why not let it be up to the serveradmins?, let them decide what they think their players should have.

I know ETPub is the one introducing it, but that didnt mean it was bad, I see features in silEnT that has been in other Mods before, and I truely like the fact that you Guys are doing a great job with it.

Make sure you have this files

etmain:

server.cfg or silent.cfg and make sure you exec a maprotation file like objectivecycle.cfg in the server or silent.cfg, also make sure the objectivecycle.cfg (or whatevernameucallit) is in etmain.

 

silent:

the silent client pk3, the qagame.mp.i386.so (Linux) or the qagame.mp.i386.so (Windows)

 

in the root of your et you should have a startscript

here is mine its for Linux

#!/bin/bash

opts="+exec whatever.cfg +set net_port 27960 +set net_port_extra 27970 +set fs_homepath /opt/games/et3.0 +set fs_game silent +set g_dbMaxAliases 6 +sets gamestartup \"`date +"%D %T"`\""

while [ 1 ]; do
	./etded $opts
done

finally make sure that the maps your calling for in your map.cfg (objectivecycle.cfg) also is placed into your etmain

 

hope it helps

sorry for opening this old thread Again

 

just wondering if this still is a nogo?

 

I have lots of etpub members complaining about it atm, for them its a complete turnoff that they cant have it off.

 

if it was implemented in silent I would just use a forcecvar to make sure all had it.

 

Why not implement and thereby make sure etpub is left in the dust to die out?

 

pretty sure that setting alone is 1 of the mainthing we still see etpub servers.

 

sorry Again for reopening an old post

Would be a good feature to have

 

+1

This is not possible. It might look like it works for a while, but sooner or later it would show problems.

 

Ok, was just a thought

 

loved it when i had it running on 3 NQ Servers, worked ok the year i had it.

is it possible to ad somthing like NQ has where you can have several servers storing their xp in same place, so that xp gained on 1 server also is on the other server saving xp the same place.